Predator Downhole Inc. and Nancy Vermeulen v. Flotek Industries, Inc.
This text of Predator Downhole Inc. and Nancy Vermeulen v. Flotek Industries, Inc. (Predator Downhole Inc. and Nancy Vermeulen v. Flotek Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-15-00846-CV Style: Predator Downhole, Inc. and Nancy Vermeulen v Flotek Industries, Inc. Date motion filed*: January 19, 2016 Type of motion: Appellee’s Motion for Leave to file Appendix Under Seal Party filing motion: Appellee Document to be filed:
Is appeal accelerated? Yes
If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of prior extensions: Current Due date: Date Requested:
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Appellant’s motion does not include a certificate of conference. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5). Accordingly, the motion is denied. Nevertheless, the Court will consider any future motion filed in compliance with the rules.
Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack
Date: January 26, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Predator Downhole Inc. and Nancy Vermeulen v. Flotek Industries, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/predator-downhole-inc-and-nancy-vermeulen-v-flotek-industries-inc-texapp-2016.