Powell v. Keller

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 18, 2009·No. 09-6272·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6272

FLOYD JUNIOR POWELL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

TONY A. KELLER; JORGE SOSA; JASON COY REID; TIMOTHY JAMES BREWER; LARRY WATERS; WILLIAM A. BRAFFORD; GRETCHEN C. F. SHAPPERT; RICHARD L. VOORHEES; CARL HORN, III; GREGORY A. FOREST; JAYME MILLER; UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE; CATAWBA COUNTY; CATAWBA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; SHERIFF OF CATAWBA COUNTY; CATAWBA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; COLDWELL BANKER; BOYD HASSELL INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES; ELVALORIE MATTHEWS; RICHARD MCDONNELL; MARK T. CALLOWAY; NEWTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:09-cv-00004-GCM)

Submitted: May 29, 2009 Decided: June 18, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Floyd Junior Powell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Floyd Junior Powell appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the

record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.

See Powell v. Keller, No. 5:09-cv-00004-GCM (W.D.N.C. Jan. 13,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell v. Keller, (4th Cir. 2009).

Powell v. Keller (Powell v. Keller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.