Powell v. Keller

Fourth Circuit

Powell v. Keller

274 F. App'x 330

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 22, 2008·No. No. 07-7780·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Floyd Junior Powell appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Powell v. Keller, No. 5:07-cv-00121-GCM, 2007 WL 4139645 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Floyd Junior Powell appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Powell v. Keller, No. 5:07-cv-00121-GCM, 2007 WL 4139645 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Powell v. Keller, 274 F. App'x 330 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

274 F. App'x 330 (Powell v. Keller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related