Powell v. Keller

Fourth Circuit

Powell v. Keller

206 F. App'x 243

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 17, 2006·No. No. 06-1898·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rose C. Powell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her motion for a hearing, her civil rights complaint, and her motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. According, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Powell v. Keller, No. 5:03-CV-00160-5-MU (W.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2006). We deny Powell’s motions for judicial notice and to dismiss defendant-appellee’s motion for summary judgment and informal briefs. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Rose C. Powell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her motion for a hearing, her civil rights complaint, and her motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. According, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Powell v. Keller, No. 5:03-CV-00160-5-MU (W.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2006). We deny Powell’s motions for judicial notice and to dismiss defendant-appellee’s motion for summary judgment and informal briefs. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Powell v. Keller, 206 F. App'x 243 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

206 F. App'x 243 (Powell v. Keller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.