Powell v. Keller

Fourth Circuit

Powell v. Keller

120 F. App'x 512

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2005·No. No. 04-2116·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rose C. Powell appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendants on her civil rights complaint that alleged violations based upon the forfeiture of real property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Powell v. Keller, No. CA-03-160-5-MU (W.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rose C. Powell appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to defendants on her civil rights complaint that alleged violations based upon the forfeiture of real property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Powell v. Keller, No. CA-03-160-5-MU (W.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Powell v. Keller, 120 F. App'x 512 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

120 F. App'x 512 (Powell v. Keller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.