Powell v. Keller
This text of 476 F. App'x 538 (Powell v. Keller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Rose C. Powell appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Powell’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, she has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment and deny Powell’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
476 F. App'x 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powell-v-keller-ca4-2012.