Porter v. Jones
This text of 518 F.3d 1181 (Porter v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Order; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD.
ORDER
Judges Fisher and Clifton voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Martinez so recommends.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing en banc, filed August 27, 2007, is denied.
Judge Kleinfeld’s dissent from denial of rehearing en banc is filed concurrently herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
518 F.3d 1181, 2008 WL 659672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-jones-ca9-2008.