Porter v. Jones

518 F.3d 1181, 2008 WL 659672
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 12, 2008
Docket06-55517
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 518 F.3d 1181 (Porter v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Porter v. Jones, 518 F.3d 1181, 2008 WL 659672 (9th Cir. 2008).

Opinions

Order; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD.

ORDER

Judges Fisher and Clifton voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Martinez so recommends.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing en banc, filed August 27, 2007, is denied.

Judge Kleinfeld’s dissent from denial of rehearing en banc is filed concurrently herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Victor Childs v. Steven Stafford
551 F. App'x 353 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
518 F.3d 1181, 2008 WL 659672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-jones-ca9-2008.