Poluskiewicz v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

101 A. 638, 257 Pa. 305, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 729
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 23, 1917
DocketAppeal, No. 372
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 101 A. 638 (Poluskiewicz v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poluskiewicz v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co., 101 A. 638, 257 Pa. 305, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 729 (Pa. 1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Section 409 of the Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, is as follows: “A referee’s findings of fact shall be final, unless the board shall allow an appeal therefrom as hereinafter provided. The board’s findings of fact shall in all cases be final. From the referee’s decision on any question of law an appeal may be taken to the board, and from any decision of the board on a question of law an appeal may be-taken to the courts, as hereinafter provided.” Referees and the Workmen’s Compensation Board must realize the great responsibility imposed upon -them by the provision that their findings of fact are final. If they err in this respect, courts can grant no relief to p.arties who may be wronged-. In the light of the plain words of the statute, the learned court below was of the correct opinion that it could not disturb the facts found by the compensation board.

Appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atkinson v. Keating
26 Pa. D. & C. 540 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1936)
Ferrante v. Ferrante
186 A. 426 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Di Marcantonio v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund
15 Pa. D. & C. 56 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1931)
Ford v. A. E. Dick Co.
135 A. 903 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.
133 A. 256 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Callihan v. Montgomery
115 A. 889 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Ambrose v. Coxe Bros. & Co.
109 A. 642 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Mailman's Case
106 A. 606 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1919)
Hancock v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.
107 A. 735 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
McGurrin v. Hudson Coal Co.
107 A. 687 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Gallagher v. Walton Mfg. Co.
107 A. 327 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Cartin v. Standard Tin Plate Co.
106 A. 63 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Flucker v. Carnegie Steel Co.
106 A. 192 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Davis v. Smith
105 A. 559 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)
McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co.
104 A. 617 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)
Messinger v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
104 A. 623 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A. 638, 257 Pa. 305, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poluskiewicz-v-philadelphia-reading-coal-iron-co-pa-1917.