Cartin v. Standard Tin Plate Co.
106 A. 63, 263 Pa. 56, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 374
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 4, 1919
DocketAppeal, No. 97
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases
This text of 106 A. 63 (Cartin v. Standard Tin Plate Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cartin v. Standard Tin Plate Co., 106 A. 63, 263 Pa. 56, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 374 (Pa. 1919).
Opinion
The question here sought to be raised was clearly one of fact not of law, and the learned court very properly decided that into such controversy it could not enter. Poluskiewicz v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co., 257 Pa. 305, is a case in point.
Appeal dismissed at appellant’s cost.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Madison Construction Co. v. WCAB (Tascarella)
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2018
Morocho v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Home Equity Renovations, Inc.)
167 A.3d 855 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)
Bele v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.
21 A.2d 450 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Michetti v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund
17 A.2d 712 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Laverick v. H. B. Underwood Corp.
16 Pa. D. & C. 729 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1932)
Hager v. Norristown Magnesia Asbestos Co.
87 Pa. Super. 159 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Fillip v. Wm. Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co.
80 Pa. Super. 68 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Chovic v. Pittsburgh Crucible Steel Co.
71 Pa. Super. 350 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
106 A. 63, 263 Pa. 56, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cartin-v-standard-tin-plate-co-pa-1919.