Gallagher v. Walton Mfg. Co.
107 A. 327, 264 Pa. 29, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 584
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 17, 1919·No. Appeal, No. 224·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
The question whether the decedent was engaged in the course of his employment at the time of the accident which resulted in his death was one of fact. The finding of the referee, approved by the compensation board, was “at the time of the occurrence of the injury Gallagher was in the course of his employment with the defendant.” This is conclusive: Poluskiewicz v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Company, 257 Pa. 305; Messinger v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Company, 261 Pa. 336.
Appeal dismissed and award affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gallagher v. Walton Mfg. Co., 107 A. 327, 264 Pa. 29, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 584 (Pa. 1919).
107 A. 327 (Gallagher v. Walton Mfg. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Saylor v. Gehley's Carpet Store
9 Pa. D. & C. 509 (York County Court of Common Pleas, 1927)
Callihan v. Montgomery
115 A. 889 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Shultz v. Haffelfinger Wall Paper Co.
1 Pa. D. & C. 244 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1921)
Ferri v. Lenni Quarry Co.
109 A. 845 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Tarr v. Hecla Coal & Coke Co.
109 A. 224 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Blouss v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R.
73 Pa. Super. 95 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)