Polk v. Beeler

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Polk v. Beeler. Read the opinion of the Court — 276 F. App'x 311
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 28, 2010·No. 10-6983·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6983

KEVIN SEAN POLK,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

A. F. BEELER; DAVID T. HUBAND,

Respondents – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:09-hc-02126-D)

Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 28, 2010

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Sean Polk, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kevin Sean Polk, formerly a federal prisoner, appeals

the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Polk v. Beeler, No.

5:09-hc-02126-D (E.D.N.C. July 2, 2010). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Polk v. Beeler, (4th Cir. 2010).

Polk v. Beeler (Polk v. Beeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241