Polk v. Beeler

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Polk v. Beeler. Read the opinion of the Court — 276 F. App'x 311
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 8, 2008·No. 07-7540·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7540

KEVIN SEAN POLK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

A. L. BEELER; ALBERTO R. GONZALES,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:07-hc-02064-D)

Submitted: March 20, 2008 Decided: May 8, 2008

Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Sean Polk, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kevin Sean Polk, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Polk v. Beeler, No. 5:07-hc-02064-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28,

2007). We deny Polk’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Polk v. Beeler, (4th Cir. 2008).

Polk v. Beeler (Polk v. Beeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241