Polk v. Beeler

Fourth Circuit

Polk v. Beeler

406 F. App'x 694

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 28, 2010·No. No. 10-6983·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Sean Polk, formerly a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Polk v. Beeler, No. 5:09-hc-02126-D, 2010 WL 2680013 (E.D.N.C. July 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Sean Polk, formerly a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Polk v. Beeler, No. 5:09-hc-02126-D, 2010 WL 2680013 (E.D.N.C. July 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Polk v. Beeler, 406 F. App'x 694 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

406 F. App'x 694 (Polk v. Beeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related