Polk v. Beeler

Fourth Circuit

Polk v. Beeler

276 F. App'x 311

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 8, 2008·No. No. 07-7540·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Sean Polk, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Polk v. Beeler, No. 5:07-hc-02064-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2007). We deny Polk’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Sean Polk, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Polk v. Beeler, No. 5:07-hc-02064-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2007). We deny Polk’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Polk v. Beeler, 276 F. App'x 311 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

276 F. App'x 311 (Polk v. Beeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related