Polk v. Beeler
This text of Polk v. Beeler (Polk v. Beeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7540
KEVIN SEAN POLK,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
A. L. BEELER; ALBERTO R. GONZALES,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:07-hc-02064-D)
Submitted: March 20, 2008 Decided: May 8, 2008
Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Sean Polk, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kevin Sean Polk, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Polk v. Beeler, No. 5:07-hc-02064-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28,
2007). We deny Polk’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Polk v. Beeler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polk-v-beeler-ca4-2008.