PLUNKET v. Lane

207 N.E.2d 215, 246 Ind. 530, 1965 Ind. LEXIS 385
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 20, 1965·No. 0-750·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Achor, J.

Petitioner has filed pro se in this court a pleading entitled “Verified Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.” Petitioner pleaded guilty to a charge of second degree burglary, for which he was convicted. The pleading constitutes an attempt to attack the validity of *531 petitioner’s commitment by raising questions concerning the conduct of a presentence investigation of his case.

This court on many occasions has noted that we have no jurisdiction to entertain the petition here presented since no original jurisdiction to grant writs of habeas corpus has been placed in the Supreme Court. Lucianno v. Lane, Warden (1965), 246 Ind. 186, 204 N. E. 2d 220; State ex rel. Morvilius v. State (1960), 241 Ind. 199, 170 N. E. 2d 825; Rash v. Howard (1948), 226 Ind. 546, 82 N. E. 2d 88.

For the above reasons the petition for habeas corpus is dismissed.

Arterburn, C. J., Jackson, Landis & Myers, JJ., concur.

Note. — Reported in 207 N. E. 2d 215.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PLUNKET v. Lane, 207 N.E.2d 215, 246 Ind. 530, 1965 Ind. LEXIS 385 (Ind. 1965).

207 N.E.2d 215 (PLUNKET v. Lane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pitman v. Buck
212 N.E.2d 157 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1965)
Prosser v. State
212 N.E.2d 157 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1965)
La Pinta v. State
207 N.E.2d 215 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1965)