Rash v. Howard
This text of 82 N.E.2d 88 (Rash v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner in this matter has requested that we entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. It is his contention that the judgment of conviction, under which he is restrained of his liberty, is void and that this court should take jurisdiction of the matter.
The jurisdiction of this court under the constitution is appellate in nature, excepting in those instances where original jurisdiction is conferred by statute. Article 7, Section 4 of the Constitution of the State of Indiana.
*547 *546 The legislature of the state has conferred limited original jurisdiction on this court by § 3-2201, Burns’ 1946 Replacement. Under the above statute, mandate *547 may issue out of this court to compel the performance of any duty imposed by law on the various courts of this state, and this court may entertain original actions to prohibit an inferior court from going beyond its jurisdiction. The original jurisdiction granted to this court under the above statute is limited to the two classes of actions above mentioned and to matters in aid of its appellate jurisdiction. Since this court does not have original jurisdiction of petitions for writs of habeas corpus and has but limited jurisdiction for writs of mandate and prohibition as above outlined, the petition in this matter must be and it is hereby dismissed.
Note.—Reported in 82 N. E. 2d 88.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 N.E.2d 88, 226 Ind. 546, 1948 Ind. LEXIS 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rash-v-howard-ind-1948.