Pitman v. Buck

Indiana Supreme Court

Pitman v. Buck

212 N.E.2d 157, 247 Ind. 93, 1965 Ind. LEXIS 314

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 8, 1965

DocketNo. 0-779

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 212 N.E.2d 157 (Pitman v. Buck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pitman v. Buck, 212 N.E.2d 157, 247 Ind. 93, 1965 Ind. LEXIS 314 (Ind. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Myers, C. J.

This is a verified petition for a writ of habeas corpus “ad-testificandum, ad-sub jiciendum” addressed to this court by Manuel V. Pitman, who designates himself as petitioner herein. It is claimed that he is wrongfully serving a term in the Indiana State Reformatory where he is now confined. He apparently pleaded guilty to a crime and now wishes to withdraw that plea and plead not guilty.

This procedure is the wrong approach to reopening petitioner’s case. The Supreme Court of Indiana has no original jurisdiction to issue writs of habeas corpus. Plunkett v. Lane, Warden (1965), 246 Ind. 530, 207 N. E. 2d 215; Lucianno v. Lane, Warden (1965), 246 Ind. 185, 204 N. E. 2d 220.

Petition denied.

Arterburn and Jackson JJ., concur. Achor, J., not participating.

Note. — Reported in 212 N. E. 2d 157.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI