Prosser v. State

212 N.E.2d 157, 247 Ind. 94, 1965 Ind. LEXIS 315
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 8, 1965
DocketNo. 0-788
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 212 N.E.2d 157 (Prosser v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prosser v. State, 212 N.E.2d 157, 247 Ind. 94, 1965 Ind. LEXIS 315 (Ind. 1965).

Opinion

Myers, C. J.

This is a verified petition for a writ of habeas corpus “ad-subjiceindum” addressed to this court, pro se, by Daniel Prosser, who designates himself as the petitioner herein. It is claimed that he was wrongfully convicted of assault and battery with intent to rape on September 11, 1962. He is now serving a one-to-ten year sentence at the Indiana State Reformatory.

The Supreme Court of Indiana has no jurisdiction to entertain such a petition as is presented here since no original power to grant writs of habeas corpus has been given to it by Constitution or by Statute. Plunkett v. Lane, Warden (1965), 246 Ind. 530, 207 N. E. 2d 215; Lucianno v. Lane, Warden (1965), 246 Ind. 185, 204 N. E. 2d 220.

Petition denied.

Arterburn and Jackson, JJ., concur. Achor, J., not participating.

Note. — Reported in 212 N. E. 2d 157.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pitman v. Buck
212 N.E.2d 157 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 N.E.2d 157, 247 Ind. 94, 1965 Ind. LEXIS 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prosser-v-state-ind-1965.