Pietsch v. McKissack & McKissack

District of Columbia

Pietsch v. McKissack & McKissack

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedJanuary 12, 2010

DocketCivil Action No. 2009-0390

StatusPublished

This text of Pietsch v. McKissack & McKissack (Pietsch v. McKissack & McKissack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pietsch v. McKissack & McKissack, (D.D.C. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MARY JANE PIETSCH, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 09-0390 (RMU) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 3, 7, 12 : MCKISSACK & MCKISSACK, : : Defendant. :

ORDER

GRANTING THE PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT; DENYING AS MOOT THE PLAINTIFF’S FIRST MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

For the reasons stated in the court’s Memorandum Opinion separately and

contemporaneously issued this 12th day of January, 2010, it is hereby

ORDERED that the plaintiff’s second motion to amend the complaint is GRANTED;

and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff’s first motion to amend the complaint is

DENIED as moot; and it is

ORDERED that the defendant’s motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

RICARDO M. URBINA United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI