Phillips v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Phillips v. Travis

289 A.D.2d 1035, 735 N.Y.S.2d 842, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12687

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 2001

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 289 A.D.2d 1035 (Phillips v. Travis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillips v. Travis, 289 A.D.2d 1035, 735 N.Y.S.2d 842, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12687 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment that dismissed his petition seeking to vacate the determination of the Parole Board denying his request for parole release. The appeal must be dismissed as moot because the determination expired during the pendency of this appeal, and the Parole Board again denied petitioner’s request for parole release (see, Matter of Alicea v New York State Div. of Parole, 265 AD2d 769; Matter of Brunner v Speckard, 214 AD2d 1040, lv denied 86 NY2d 707; Matter of Rentz v [1036]*1036Herbert, 206 AD2d 944, 944-945, lv denied 84 NY2d 810). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Corning, J. — CPLR art 78.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment that dismissed his petition seeking to vacate the determination of the Parole Board denying his request for parole release. The appeal must be dismissed as moot because the determination expired during the pendency of this appeal, and the Parole Board again denied petitioner’s request for parole release (see, Matter of Alicea v New York State Div. of Parole, 265 AD2d 769; Matter of Brunner v Speckard, 214 AD2d 1040, lv denied 86 NY2d 707; Matter of Rentz v [1036]*1036Herbert, 206 AD2d 944, 944-945, lv denied 84 NY2d 810). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Corning, J. — CPLR art 78.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 A.D.2d 1035, 735 N.Y.S.2d 842, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-travis-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack