Brunner v. Speckard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brunner v. Speckard

214 A.D.2d 1040, 627 N.Y.S.2d 600, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6854

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 214 A.D.2d 1040 (Brunner v. Speckard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brunner v. Speckard, 214 A.D.2d 1040, 627 N.Y.S.2d 600, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: This appeal from a judgment that denied petitioner’s challenge to a determination of the Parole Board to deny parole release is moot. The determination expired during the pendency of this appeal, and a subsequent determination to deny parole release was made (see, Matter of Chenier v Richard W., 82 NY2d 830, 832). This appeal does not present a novel issue that is likely [1041]*1041to recur and will typically evade review (see, Matter of Chenier v Richard W., supra; Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gorski, J.—CPLR art 78.) Present—Green, J. P., Law-ton, Wesley, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: This appeal from a judgment that denied petitioner’s challenge to a determination of the Parole Board to deny parole release is moot. The determination expired during the pendency of this appeal, and a subsequent determination to deny parole release was made (see, Matter of Chenier v Richard W., 82 NY2d 830, 832). This appeal does not present a novel issue that is likely [1041]*1041to recur and will typically evade review (see, Matter of Chenier v Richard W., supra; Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gorski, J.—CPLR art 78.) Present—Green, J. P., Law-ton, Wesley, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 A.D.2d 1040, 627 N.Y.S.2d 600, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brunner-v-speckard-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack