Patterson v. Berbary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Patterson v. Berbary

1 A.D.2d 943, 767 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1 A.D.3d 943, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12258

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 1 A.D.2d 943 (Patterson v. Berbary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patterson v. Berbary, 1 A.D.2d 943, 767 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1 A.D.3d 943, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12258 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of Supreme Court, Erie County (O’Donnell, J.), entered April 29, 2002, which dismissed the petition in this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition challenging the determination of the Parole Board that denied his request for parole release. This appeal must be dismissed as moot because the determination expired during the pendency of this appeal, and the Parole Board denied petitioner’s subsequent request for parole release (see Matter of Phillips v Travis, 289 AD2d 1035 [2001]; Matter of Alicea v New York State Div. of Parole, 265 AD2d 769 [1999]). Present— Green, J.P., Wisner, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of Supreme Court, Erie County (O’Donnell, J.), entered April 29, 2002, which dismissed the petition in this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition challenging the determination of the Parole Board that denied his request for parole release. This appeal must be dismissed as moot because the determination expired during the pendency of this appeal, and the Parole Board denied petitioner’s subsequent request for parole release (see Matter of Phillips v Travis, 289 AD2d 1035 [2001]; Matter of Alicea v New York State Div. of Parole, 265 AD2d 769 [1999]). Present— Green, J.P., Wisner, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 943, 767 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1 A.D.3d 943, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-berbary-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack