MANN, THOMAS v. FISCHER, BRIAN

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 21, 2014
DocketCA 13-01692
StatusPublished

This text of MANN, THOMAS v. FISCHER, BRIAN (MANN, THOMAS v. FISCHER, BRIAN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MANN, THOMAS v. FISCHER, BRIAN, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1120 CA 13-01692 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS MANN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (KATE H. NEPVEU OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.), entered August 19, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition seeking to annul the Parole Board’s determination denying him parole release. “This appeal must be dismissed as moot because the determination expired during the pendency of this appeal, and the Parole Board denied petitioner’s subsequent request for parole release” (Matter of Patterson v Berbary, 1 AD3d 943, 943, appeal dismissed and lv denied 2 NY3d 731; see Matter of Robles v Evans, 100 AD3d 1455, 1455). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply here (see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715; Matter of Sanchez v Evans, 111 AD3d 1315, 1315).

Entered: November 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hearst Corp. v. Clyne
409 N.E.2d 876 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Patterson v. Berbary
1 A.D.2d 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Robles v. Evans
100 A.D.3d 1455 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Sanchez v. Evans
111 A.D.3d 1315 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MANN, THOMAS v. FISCHER, BRIAN, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mann-thomas-v-fischer-brian-nyappdiv-2014.