Rentz v. Herbert
This text of 202 A.D.2d 959 (Rentz v. Herbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Chairman, New York State Division of Parole, for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The Board of Parole, in denying release of petitioner on parole, failed to state the essential facts pertaining to the statutory factors it was required to consider (see, Executive Law § 259-i [2] [c]) and failed to set forth the reasons for denying parole. We remit this matter to the Division of Parole for the Board of Parole to state its findings of the essential facts and its reasons for denial of parole. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cos-grove, J. — Article 78.) Present — Denman, P. J., Balio, Lawton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 A.D.2d 959, 610 N.Y.S.2d 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rentz-v-herbert-nyappdiv-1994.