Phillip Morris v. Hiram Schoonfield, Warden
Opinions
We noted probable jurisdiction1 and set the case for oral argument with Williams v. Illinois, ante, p. 235, decided today. However, Maryland has recently enacted legislation2 dealing directly with the issue presented, and our holding in Williams, that an indigent may not be imprisoned beyond the maximum term specified by statute solely because of his failure to pay a fine and court costs, may shed further light on the question raised here. We therefore vacate the judgment and remand the case to the District Court for reconsideration in light of the intervening legislation and our holding in Williams v. Illinois, supra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
399 U.S. 508 (Phillip Morris v. Hiram Schoonfield, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.