Home/Supreme Court/Phillip Morris v. Hiram Schoonfield, Warden

Phillip Morris v. Hiram Schoonfield, Warden

399 U.S. 508, 90 S. Ct. 2232, 26 L. Ed. 2d 773, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 10
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 29, 1970
Docket782
StatusPublished
Cited by130 cases

This text of 399 U.S. 508 (Phillip Morris v. Hiram Schoonfield, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillip Morris v. Hiram Schoonfield, Warden, 399 U.S. 508, 90 S. Ct. 2232, 26 L. Ed. 2d 773, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 10 (1970).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We noted probable jurisdiction1 and set the case for oral argument with Williams v. Illinois, ante, p. 235, decided today. However, Maryland has recently enacted legislation2 dealing directly with the issue presented, and our holding in Williams, that an indigent may not be imprisoned beyond the maximum term specified by statute solely because of his failure to pay a fine and court costs, may shed further light on the question raised here. We therefore vacate the judgment and remand the case to the District Court for reconsideration in light of the intervening legislation and our holding in Williams v. Illinois, supra.

Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson 229891 v. Miniard
W.D. Michigan, 2024
ODonnell v. Harris County
251 F. Supp. 3d 1052 (S.D. Texas, 2017)
and SC14-1952 Jean Claude Noel v. State of Florida and Jean Claude Noel v. State of Florida
191 So. 3d 370 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)
Noel v. State
127 So. 3d 769 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
De Luna v. Hidalgo County
853 F. Supp. 2d 623 (S.D. Texas, 2012)
State v. Langlinais
27 So. 3d 1011 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2009)
State v. Ramel
2007 WI App 271 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2007)
(2001)
86 Op. Att'y Gen. 183 (Maryland Attorney General Reports, 2001)
State v. Goffe
676 A.2d 1377 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1996)
Molinas v. Commissioner of Correction
652 A.2d 481 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
Commonwealth v. Gomes
552 N.E.2d 101 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1990)
Doe v. Angelina County, Texas
733 F. Supp. 245 (E.D. Texas, 1990)
United States v. Timothy Alexander Levy
897 F.2d 596 (First Circuit, 1990)
Paul Luna Vasquez v. Thomas Cooper
862 F.2d 250 (Tenth Circuit, 1988)
Walker v. State
548 A.2d 492 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1987)
State v. Davis
514 So. 2d 517 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
Hainey v. State
1987 OK CR 120 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1987)
Turner v. State
516 A.2d 579 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1986)
State v. Bohanna
491 So. 2d 756 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
State v. Grant
490 So. 2d 272 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
399 U.S. 508, 90 S. Ct. 2232, 26 L. Ed. 2d 773, 1970 U.S. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillip-morris-v-hiram-schoonfield-warden-scotus-1970.