Philip Landry v. Judge J. Robert Hoepfner and William Guste, Jr., Attorney General, State of Louisiana

822 F.2d 510

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
• Decided: July 9, 1987
• Docket: 19-51144
• Status: Published

Opinion

822 F.2d 510

Philip LANDRY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Judge J. Robert HOEPFNER and William Guste, Jr., Attorney
General, State of Louisiana, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 85-3784.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

July 9, 1987.

Mark McTernan, McTernan, Parr & Rumage, New Orleans, La., for petitioner-appellant.

Dorothy A. Pendergast, Asst. Dist. Atty., Research & Appeals, Gretna, La., for respondents-appellees.

Rene I. Salomon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge, La., for amicus-Da's.

E. Pete Adams, Executive Director, La. Dist. Attys. Assoc., Inc., Baton Rouge, La., for amicus-Exec. Dir. La. Da's Assoc.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Patrick E. Carr, District Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion June 3, 1987, 5 Cir., 1987, 818 F.2d 1169)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.