Phelps v. State

583 So. 2d 1120, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8522, 1991 WL 159150
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 22, 1991·No. No. 90-2248·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This appeal involves a sentencing guidelines issue. Appellant was convicted of grand theft, and received a split sentence of two and one-half years incarceration followed by two years community control. Appellant’s sentencing guidelines score-sheet reflected a permitted range of community control or one to four and one-half years incarceration. This combination of incarceration and community control constitutes a departure from the guidelines. See State v. VanKooten, 522 So.2d 830 (Fla. 1988); Burgess v. State, 569 So.2d 829 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Harris v. State, 564 So.2d 283 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Because the record contains no written departure reasons, the sentence must be reversed and the case remanded for resentencing.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; SENTENCE REVERSED and REMANDED.

W. SHARP and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phelps v. State, 583 So. 2d 1120, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8522, 1991 WL 159150 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

583 So. 2d 1120 (Phelps v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Felty v. State
616 So. 2d 88 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Harmon v. State
599 So. 2d 754 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)