Phelps v. State

569 So. 2d 1382, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8878, 1990 WL 180952
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Phelps v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3502
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 21, 1990·No. No. 90-02944·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arthur Phelps appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct sentence. The circuit court found that it was without jurisdiction to consider the motion because an appeal was pending. See Marshall v. State, 481 So.2d 973 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). However, that appeal, while involving issues similar to those in the present case, appears to have been filed in a different circuit court case, and was decided prior to the commencement of the present action. Phelps v. State, 561 So.2d 32 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Because we believe Phelps has set forth a prima facie showing of his entitlement to additional credit for time served, we remand this case to the circuit court for consideration on its merits.

Reversed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and HALL and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phelps v. State, 569 So. 2d 1382, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8878, 1990 WL 180952 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

569 So. 2d 1382 (Phelps v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marshall v. State
481 So. 2d 973 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Phelps v. State
561 So. 2d 32 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)