Phelps v. State
This text of 555 So. 2d 1329 (Phelps v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant was convicted of grand theft. As a part of his sentence the trial court suspended his driver’s license for thirty-six months. There is no indication that a motor vehicle was involved in the crime.
As the parties agree, this is not a case where the trial court is authorized to suspend a license or in which the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles must revoke the license upon receiving the record of the conviction. See Mandile v. State, 547 So.2d 1062 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).
[1330]*1330Accordingly, we vacate that portion of the appellant’s sentence suspending his driver’s license. Otherwise, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
555 So. 2d 1329, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 573, 1990 WL 7531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phelps-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.