Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Phelps v. State

Phelps v. State

555 So. 2d 1329, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 573, 1990 WL 7531
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Phelps v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3502 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 1990·No. No. 89-01002·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of grand theft. As a part of his sentence the trial court suspended his driver’s license for thirty-six months. There is no indication that a motor vehicle was involved in the crime.

As the parties agree, this is not a case where the trial court is authorized to suspend a license or in which the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles must revoke the license upon receiving the record of the conviction. See Mandile v. State, 547 So.2d 1062 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

[1330]*1330Accordingly, we vacate that portion of the appellant’s sentence suspending his driver’s license. Otherwise, we affirm.

FRANK, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phelps v. State, 555 So. 2d 1329, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 573, 1990 WL 7531 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

555 So. 2d 1329 (Phelps v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mandile v. State
547 So. 2d 1062 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)