Peterson v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Peterson v. Peterson

153 N.W.2d 830, 278 Minn. 432, 1967 Minn. LEXIS 889

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedOctober 27, 1967

DocketNo. 39,894

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 153 N.W.2d 830 (Peterson v. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peterson v. Peterson, 153 N.W.2d 830, 278 Minn. 432, 1967 Minn. LEXIS 889 (Mich. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Pep Curiam.

Relptor was convicted of contempt by the District Court of Hennepin Coupty OP March 19, 1965. The contempt was both constructive and criminal in nature. Because relator was not afforded a jury trial and the proceedings do not conform to the procedures required by our decision in Peterson [433]*433v. Peterson, 278 Minn. 275, 153 N. W. (2d) 825, his convictioh Must be reversed and a new trial granted.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pep Curiam.

Relptor was convicted of contempt by the District Court of Hennepin Coupty OP March 19, 1965. The contempt was both constructive and criminal in nature. Because relator was not afforded a jury trial and the proceedings do not conform to the procedures required by our decision in Peterson [433]*433v. Peterson, 278 Minn. 275, 153 N. W. (2d) 825, his convictioh Must be reversed and a new trial granted.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

153 N.W.2d 830, 278 Minn. 432, 1967 Minn. LEXIS 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterson-v-peterson-minn-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack