Perry v. the State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Perry v. the State

764 S.E.2d 178, 329 Ga. App. 121

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 9, 2014

DocketA14A0766

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 764 S.E.2d 178 (Perry v. the State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perry v. the State, 764 S.E.2d 178, 329 Ga. App. 121 (Ga. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Miller, Judge.

A jury found Randarius Perry guilty of four counts of violating the Georgia Street Gang Terrorism and Prevention Act (OCGA § 16-15-1 et seq.) (Counts 57 through 60), armed robbery (OCGA § 16-8-41 (a)) (Count 61), aggravated assault (OCGA § 16-5-21 (a) (1) (2010)) (Count 62), and two counts of possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony (OCGA § 16-11-106 (b) (1)) (Counts 63 and 64). Perry appeals from his convictions; however, the case is not final and ripe for appeal.

At sentencing, the trial court orally announced that Count 58 would merge into Count 57, Count 60 would merge into Count 59, Count 62 merged into Count 61, and Count 64 merged into Count 63. The record, however, shows that the court only entered written sentences on Counts 57, 59, 61, and 63. The trial court did not enter written sentences on Counts 58, 60, 62, or 64, nor did the trial court enter a notation showing that these counts merged into other counts for purposes of sentencing.

When “a multi-count indictment is the subject of one trial and the factfinder returns a verdict of guilty on each count of the indictment, the case is not final and subject to appeal until a sentence has been entered on each count of the indictment.” Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 (571 SE2d 806) (2002). Since the trial court did not enter a written sentence on each count, Perry’s case is still pending in the trial court and is not ripe for appeal. Id. Therefore, this case is remanded with direction for the trial court to enter a written sentence disposing of all counts of which Perry was found guilty. “After such entry, the case may be transmitted to this [C] ourt for re-docketing because the notice of appeal, prematurely filed, then will have ripened.” (Footnote omitted.) Bass v. State, 284 Ga. App. 331, 332 (643 SE2d 851) (2007).

Case remanded with direction.

Doyle, P. J., and Dillard, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller, Judge.

A jury found Randarius Perry guilty of four counts of violating the Georgia Street Gang Terrorism and Prevention Act (OCGA § 16-15-1 et seq.) (Counts 57 through 60), armed robbery (OCGA § 16-8-41 (a)) (Count 61), aggravated assault (OCGA § 16-5-21 (a) (1) (2010)) (Count 62), and two counts of possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony (OCGA § 16-11-106 (b) (1)) (Counts 63 and 64). Perry appeals from his convictions; however, the case is not final and ripe for appeal.

At sentencing, the trial court orally announced that Count 58 would merge into Count 57, Count 60 would merge into Count 59, Count 62 merged into Count 61, and Count 64 merged into Count 63. The record, however, shows that the court only entered written sentences on Counts 57, 59, 61, and 63. The trial court did not enter written sentences on Counts 58, 60, 62, or 64, nor did the trial court enter a notation showing that these counts merged into other counts for purposes of sentencing.

When “a multi-count indictment is the subject of one trial and the factfinder returns a verdict of guilty on each count of the indictment, the case is not final and subject to appeal until a sentence has been entered on each count of the indictment.” Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680 (571 SE2d 806) (2002). Since the trial court did not enter a written sentence on each count, Perry’s case is still pending in the trial court and is not ripe for appeal. Id. Therefore, this case is remanded with direction for the trial court to enter a written sentence disposing of all counts of which Perry was found guilty. “After such entry, the case may be transmitted to this [C] ourt for re-docketing because the notice of appeal, prematurely filed, then will have ripened.” (Footnote omitted.) Bass v. State, 284 Ga. App. 331, 332 (643 SE2d 851) (2007).

Case remanded with direction.

Doyle, P. J., and Dillard, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

764 S.E.2d 178, 329 Ga. App. 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-the-state-gactapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack