Anabel Cristina Vargas v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 23, 2019
DocketA19A0837
StatusPublished

This text of Anabel Cristina Vargas v. State (Anabel Cristina Vargas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anabel Cristina Vargas v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ September 11, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0837. VARGAS v. THE STATE.

Anabel Cristina Vargas appeals her conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol. However, the case is not final and ripe for appeal. Vargas was charged via accusation with driving under the influence of alcohol to the extent that it was less safe for her to drive, driving with an unlawful blood- alcohol concentration, and failure to yield. Her case proceeded to a jury trial on all three counts. At the close of the state’s case, Vargas’s attorney moved for a directed verdict of acquittal on the failure-to-yield count. The trial court granted the motion and removed the failure-to-yield count from the jury’s consideration. The jury found Vargas guilty of both DUI counts, which the court merged for purposes of sentencing in the judgment of conviction. The court never entered a written order regarding the oral grant of the motion for directed verdict of acquittal on the failure-to-yield count. Nor did the court refer to the failure-to-yield count in the judgment of conviction. The oral statement of the trial judge that he was granting the motion for directed verdict of acquittal on the failure-to-yield count was not a judgment on that count. Harden v. State, 160 Ga. App. 514, 515-516 (1) (287 SE2d 329) (1981). “Since the trial court did not enter [an order resolving the failure-to yield count, Vargas’s] case is still pending in the trial court and is not ripe for appeal. Therefore, this case is remanded with direction for the trial court to enter a written [judgment on the failure-to-yield count]. After such entry, the case may be transmitted to this (c)ourt for re-docketing because the notice of appeal, prematurely filed, then will have ripened.” Perry v. State, 329 Ga. App. 121 (764 SE2d 178) (2014) (citations and punctuation omitted).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 09/11/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harden v. State
287 S.E.2d 329 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Perry v. the State
764 S.E.2d 178 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Anabel Cristina Vargas v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anabel-cristina-vargas-v-state-gactapp-2019.