Jafney Thelusma v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 23, 2019
DocketA19A2306
StatusPublished

This text of Jafney Thelusma v. State (Jafney Thelusma v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jafney Thelusma v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 23, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A2306. JAFNEY THELUSMA v. THE STATE.

A jury found Jafney Thelusma guilty of three counts of violating the Street Gang and Terrorism Prevention Act (Counts 3-5) and one count each of fleeing or attempting to elude an officer (Count 6), theft by receiving stolen property (Count 7), possession of a firearm by a first offender probationer (Count 8), discharging a gun near a highway or street (Count 9), and driving with a suspended license (Count 10). The superior court entered a written sentence on these convictions, and Thelusma filed a motion for a new trial, in which, inter alia, he challenged the sufficiency of the evidence on several of the convictions. The superior court denied the motion for a new trial as to Counts 6 and 9-10, but granted the motion as to Counts 3-5 and 7-8. The court subsequently granted the State’s motion for entry of an order of nolle prosequi as to Counts 3-5 and 7-8. The court did not, however, enter a new written sentence. Thelusma has filed this timely appeal from the superior court order that disposed of his motion for a new trial. Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1), appeals generally may be taken from “[a]ll final judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below.” Here, absent a new sentencing order, the case remains pending in the superior court. Cf. Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680, 680 (571 SE2d 806) (2002). Consequently, we lack jurisdiction over this premature appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. Upon entry of a new sentencing order, the superior court clerk is DIRECTED to re-transmit the case to this Court for re-docketing. Thelusma need not file a second notice of appeal, as his prematurely filed notice of appeal will ripen upon entry of a new written sentence. See Perry v. State, 329 Ga. App. 121, 121 (764 SE2d 178) (2014); Livingston v. State, 221 Ga. App. 563, 564-568 (1) (472 SE2d 317) (1996).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/23/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keller v. State
571 S.E.2d 806 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2002)
Livingston v. State
472 S.E.2d 317 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Perry v. the State
764 S.E.2d 178 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jafney Thelusma v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jafney-thelusma-v-state-gactapp-2019.