Perry v. State
682 So. 2d 676, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11636, 1996 WL 637670
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Perry v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 675 So. 2d 976 →
Opinion
On October 27, 1995, the trial court entered two conflicting orders relating to appellant’s restitution obligation. One order requires appellant to pay restitution to the victim in an amount to be determined. The other order states that restitution is not ordered and not applicable. We reverse the trial court’s imposition of restitution and remand the cause with instructions for the trial court to resolve the conflict. We affirm the trial court’s determination of credit for jail time served.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perry v. State, 682 So. 2d 676, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11636, 1996 WL 637670 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
682 So. 2d 676 (Perry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.