Perry v. State

673 So. 2d 557, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5441, 1996 WL 263409
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 20, 1996·No. No. 95-4628·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two issues for our review. We affirm the first issue without further discussion. We reverse and remand for re-sentencing on the second issue.

Appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine and sentenced under the 1994 guidelines to one year in county jail followed by two years on community control based on a guidelines scoresheet total of 34 points. As we explained in our opinion in Simmons v. State, 668 So.2d 654 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), the trial court has imposed a departure sentence without written reasons. Accordingly, we remand for resentencing. We also certify the same question that we certified in Simmons:

IS THE RULE IN DAVIS v. STATE, 630 So.2d 1059 (Fla.1994), REQUIRING WRITTEN REASONS FOR DEPARTURE WHEN COMBINING NONSTATE PRISON SANCTIONS, APPLICABLE UNDER THE 1994 SENTENCING GUIDELINES?
MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., and SMITH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perry v. State, 673 So. 2d 557, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5441, 1996 WL 263409 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

673 So. 2d 557 (Perry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Perry
687 So. 2d 831 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Watkins v. State
680 So. 2d 547 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)