Perry v. State

663 So. 2d 11, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12577, 1995 WL 700190
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 1995·No. No. 95-0052·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s conviction and sentence as to counts I and II. However, we reverse the additional convictions and sentences for Appellant’s “failure to appear.” We remand with direction that the two convictions for failure to appear be vacated, as it is conceded that Appellant was not formally charged with those offenses.

GUNTHER, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perry v. State, 663 So. 2d 11, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12577, 1995 WL 700190 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

663 So. 2d 11 (Perry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scala v. State
770 So. 2d 732 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Repetti v. State
741 So. 2d 646 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)