Peripheral Dynamics, Inc. v. Holdsworth

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Peripheral Dynamics, Inc. v. Holdsworth

385 A.2d 1354, 254 Pa. Super. 310, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2840

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 13, 1978·No. 2109·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

The six Judges who heard this appeal being equally divided, the order is affirmed.

SPAETH, J., files an opinion in support of affirmance in which JACOBS, P. J., joins. HOFFMAN, J., files a concurring opinion. VAN der VOORT, J., files an opinion in support of reversal in which CERCONE and PRICE, JJ., join. WATKINS, former President Judge, did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The six Judges who heard this appeal being equally divided, the order is affirmed.

SPAETH, J., files an opinion in support of affirmance in which JACOBS, P. J., joins. HOFFMAN, J., files a concurring opinion. VAN der VOORT, J., files an opinion in support of reversal in which CERCONE and PRICE, JJ., join. WATKINS, former President Judge, did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Peripheral Dynamics, Inc. v. Holdsworth, 385 A.2d 1354, 254 Pa. Super. 310, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2840 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

385 A.2d 1354 (Peripheral Dynamics, Inc. v. Holdsworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related