Home/California Supreme Court/People v. Williams

People v. Williams

91 P.3d 163, 14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 211, 2004 Daily Journal DAR 6865, 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5018, 2004 Cal. LEXIS 4831
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJune 9, 2004
DocketS123910
StatusPublished

This text of 91 P.3d 163 (People v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Williams, 91 P.3d 163, 14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 211, 2004 Daily Journal DAR 6865, 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5018, 2004 Cal. LEXIS 4831 (Cal. 2004).

Opinion

14 Cal.Rptr.3d 211 (2004)
91 P.3d 163

PEOPLE
v.
WILLIAMS.

No. S123910.

Supreme Court of California.

June 9, 2004.

Review granted/briefing deferred (rule 29.1).

Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in People v. Howard, 125 Cal.Rptr.2d 442, 54 P.3d 262 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 28.2(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California *212 Rules of Court, rule 29.1, is deferred pending further order of the court.

GEORGE, C.J., and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN and MORENO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Howard
54 P.3d 262 (California Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 P.3d 163, 14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 211, 2004 Daily Journal DAR 6865, 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5018, 2004 Cal. LEXIS 4831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-williams-cal-2004.