People v. Turner
68 A.D.3d 1082, 890 N.Y.2d 335
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
[1083]*1083The Supreme Court’s determination to designate the defendant a level two sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see People v Fisher, 36 AD3d 880 [2007]; People v Inghilleri, 21 AD3d 404 [2005]; People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]). There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that he was entitled to a downward departure from this risk level (see People v Gonzalez, 48 AD3d 284 [2008]; People v Warren, 42 AD3d 593 [2007]; People v Lombard, 30 AD3d 573 [2006]). Dillon, J.P., Santucci, Florio and Hall, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Turner, 68 A.D.3d 1082, 890 N.Y.2d 335 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).
68 A.D.3d 1082 (People v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Martinez
84 A.D.3d 909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)