People v. Turner

60 A.D.3d 1095, 875 N.Y.S.2d 798
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Turner. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 A.D.3d 1018

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered July 20, 2006, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts), attempted robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was improperly impeached with a prior inconsistent statement he made while testifying before the grand jury is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Gill, 54 AD3d 965 [2008]). In any event, the defendant’s contention is without merit. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the statements that he made before the grand jury were admissible as prior inconsistent statements (see People v Wise, 46 NY2d 321 [1978]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Ramirez, 89 NY2d 444 [1996]; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Skelos, J.P., Fisher, Florio and Leventhal, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Turner, 60 A.D.3d 1095, 875 N.Y.S.2d 798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

60 A.D.3d 1095 (People v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ramirez
677 N.E.2d 722 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
People v. Wise
385 N.E.2d 1262 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Gill
54 A.D.3d 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)