People v. Fisher
This text of 36 A.D.3d 880 (People v. Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Gulotta, J.), dated November 15, 2004, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
There was clear and convincing evidence to support the County Court’s determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender, and thus it will not be disturbed on appeal (see People v Inghilleri, 21 AD3d 404 [2005]; People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]; People v Brown, 7 AD3d 595 [2004]). There [881]*881is no merit to the defendant’s contention that he was entitled to a downward departure from this risk level (see People v Abdullah, 31 AD3d 515 [2006]; People v Ventura, 24 AD3d 527 [2005]; People v Dexter, 21 AD3d 403 [2005]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review. Schmidt, J.E, Santucci, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 A.D.3d 880, 827 N.Y.S.2d 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fisher-nyappdiv-2007.