People v. Imperato

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Imperato

45 A.D.3d 659, 844 N.Y.S.2d 879

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated July 15, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There was clear and convincing evidence to support the Supreme Court’s determination designating the defendant a level two sex offender (see People v Green, 44 AD3d 635 [2007]; People v Fisher, 36 AD3d 880 [2007]; People v Abdullah, 31 AD3d 515 [2006]; People v Ventura, 24 AD3d 527 [2005]). Rivera, J.P., Skelos, Fisher and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated July 15, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There was clear and convincing evidence to support the Supreme Court’s determination designating the defendant a level two sex offender (see People v Green, 44 AD3d 635 [2007]; People v Fisher, 36 AD3d 880 [2007]; People v Abdullah, 31 AD3d 515 [2006]; People v Ventura, 24 AD3d 527 [2005]). Rivera, J.P., Skelos, Fisher and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

People v. Imperato, 45 A.D.3d 659, 844 N.Y.S.2d 879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

45 A.D.3d 659 (People v. Imperato) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related