People v. Turner
68 A.D.3d 640, 889 N.Y.2d 850
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Turner. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 A.D.3d 1018 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 2009·Published
Opinion
The People met their burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, risk factors bearing a sufficient total point score to support a level three sex offender adjudication. Regardless of whether defendant’s correct point score is 120, as he contends, or 175, as contended by the People, there is no basis for a discretionary downward departure, particularly in light of defendant’s pattern of violent sexual offenses (see generally People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]). Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Catterson, Renwick, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Turner, 68 A.D.3d 640, 889 N.Y.2d 850 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).
68 A.D.3d 640 (People v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Guaman
8 A.D.3d 545 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)