People v. Taylor

286 A.D.2d 916, 731 N.Y.S.2d 410, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9092
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 28, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment of conviction entered upon his plea of guilty, defendant contends that County Court failed to conduct a sufficient inquiry into the validity of his postplea arrest before imposing an enhanced sentence for violation of a no-arrest condition of the plea bargain. We disagree. Although a court may not impose an enhanced sentence unless “the court can be satisfied * * * of the existence of a legitimate basis for the arrest” (People v Outley, 80 NY2d 702, 713; see, People v McClemore, 276 AD2d 32, 36), here the existence of a legitimate basis was established by the admission of defendant that he violated an order of protection (see, People v Outley, supra, at 713). Furthermore, we reject the contention of defendant that the court erred in denying his request to withdraw his plea (see, People v Santiago, 269 AD2d 770). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Merrill, J. — Criminal Mischief, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Wisner, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Taylor, 286 A.D.2d 916, 731 N.Y.S.2d 410, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9092 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

286 A.D.2d 916 (People v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ACKERMAN, ALBERT, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
People v. Remp
294 A.D.2d 823 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)