People v. Taylor

265 A.D.2d 510, 696 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10394
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 18, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Friedman, J.), rendered May 22, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 6793/96, upon a jury verdict, and (2) a [511] judgment of the same court, also rendered May 22, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 14705/96, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at the trial of Indictment No. 6793/96 in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentences imposed were not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Taylor, 265 A.D.2d 510, 696 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10394 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

265 A.D.2d 510 (People v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. Sabourin
269 F. Supp. 2d 20 (E.D. New York, 2003)