People v. Taylor

256 A.D.2d 1146, 682 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14264
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Because defendant was not in custody when she made statements to the police, Supreme Court properly denied her suppression motion (see, People v Bailey, 140 AD2d 356, 358). “[A] reasonable [person], innocent of any crime,” would not have considered herself to be in custody had she been in defendant’s position (People v Yukl, 25 NY2d 585, 589, rearg denied 26 NY2d 845, 883, cert denied 400 US 851). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J. — Forgery, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Taylor, 256 A.D.2d 1146, 682 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14264 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

256 A.D.2d 1146 (People v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kaufman
288 A.D.2d 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)