People v. Rodriguez

299 A.D.2d 373, 749 N.Y.S.2d 165
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 269 A.D.2d 613

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blumenfeld, J.), rendered August 29, 2001, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the trial court misapplied the law on circumstantial evidence in finding him guilty is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10).

The trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds, pursuant to CPL 30.30. The period of time from the issuance of the bench warrant to his subsequent arrest was not chargeable to the People (see CPL 30.30 [4] [c] [ii]; People v Sigismundi, 89 NY2d 587; People v Johnson, 271 AD2d 457). Feuerstein, J.P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 299 A.D.2d 373, 749 N.Y.S.2d 165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

299 A.D.2d 373 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gray
652 N.E.2d 919 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Sigismundi
679 N.E.2d 620 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
People v. Johnson
271 A.D.2d 457 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)