People v. Rodriguez

269 A.D.2d 185, 703 N.Y.S.2d 713, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1163
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 238 A.D.2d 150

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lawrence Bernstein, J.), rendered May 29, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence.

Any error in the denial of defendant’s motion to suppress and the admission of the physical evidence was harmless (see, People v Almestica, 42 NY2d 222). In light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, which included the complainant’s convincing testimony identifying defendant with whom he was acquainted, defendant’s immediate flight together with the co-defendant, the physical evidence recovered from the codefendant, and defendant’s purportedly exculpatory but actually incriminating statement, there is no reasonable possibility that the erroneously admitted evidence contributed to the conviction (Chapman v California, 386 US 18, 22-24). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Tom, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 269 A.D.2d 185, 703 N.Y.S.2d 713, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1163 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

269 A.D.2d 185 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chapman v. California
386 U.S. 18 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Almestica
366 N.E.2d 799 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)