People v. Rodriguez

266 A.D.2d 888, 698 N.Y.S.2d 178, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11810
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 12, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress pretrial statements set forth in the People’s CPL 710.30 notice. The detective who conducted the interrogation testified that he administered Miranda warnings before questioning defendant, that defendant waived his right to counsel and agreed to speak with him, and that defendant made statements to police before asking to speak with counsel. Although defendant’s testimony regarding the sequence of those events conflicted with the detective’s testimony, the court’s resolution of that credibility issue is entitled to considerable weight, and we perceive no basis in this record to disturb it (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761; People v Bullock, 233 AD2d 958, lv denied 89 NY2d 940). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J.— Robbery, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Scudder, Callahan and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rodriguez, 266 A.D.2d 888, 698 N.Y.S.2d 178, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

266 A.D.2d 888 (People v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Woods
284 A.D.2d 995 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)